Electoral Reform—Gerrymandering

Libertarian-Party-North-Carolina-Gerrymandering

How can we ensure thatelections provide fair representation for voters?

Summary

  • North Carolina is a purple state, but the NCGA invariably skews way red or way blue, depending on whether Rs or Ds are in the majority. This is because whichever party is in the majority manipulates the district maps to buttress and accentuate their electoral advantage.
  • Both establishment parties have an incentive to utilize political gerrymandering to draw as many “safe” districts—where the outcome in November is preordained—as possible to protect their incumbents.
  • “Safe” districts are toxic for representative democracy because they deny many voters the opportunity to cast a meaningful vote and they encourage candidates and  office holders to prioritize partisan grandstanding over governing.

Political gerrymandering has always been bad…but it’s worse now

Politicians have always been in charge of redistricting in North Carolina, and we had over a century of Democratic domination before the Rs took control in 2011. But the effects of political gerrymandering are worse now for two reasons.

Firstly, most of the time the Ds were in charge, the state was deep blue: when the D-R registration split is 65-35, the fact that the NCGA split is 85-15 is obviously unfair, but practically speaking, fixing that disparity would not make much difference. Now, however, the D-R split is close to 50-50, and either party having a 70-30 advantage in the NCGA is not just unreasonable, but it makes a huge political difference (as in veto-proof supermajority).

Secondly, powerful modern I/T tools enable district lines to be drawn with much more precision. Not only does this make it easier to draw maps that grossly favor one side or the other, but moving the line over a block or two to exclude a potential opponent from your district is feasible now. So, not only can politicians pick their own voters, but their own opponents!

“Safe” districts are bad for North Carolina

In “safe” districts, the only competitive races are the primaries of the dominant party, for which highly partisan voters are the most likely to turnout…handicapping candidates seeking to build consensus in favor of “scorched-earth” candidates focused on besmirching the character of their opponents—and even their opponents’ supporters—to fire up their base. Once in office, the winners of these races are incentivized to prioritize performative politics over serious governing and to avoid compromise for fear of losing to an even more partisan challenger in the next primary.

“Safe” districts effectively disenfranchise many voters. In a district that is split 71%-29%, the 29% minority party voters may as well not show up on election day, as their candidate has no chance to win. And even if they all show up and vote, it only takes 30% to beat them…so the rest of the majority party supporters may as well stay home on election day, too. In effect, 70% of all voters are disenfranchised, because their votes cannot affect the result.

And it gets worse. In many “safe” districts, the minority party does not even bother to run a candidate. Out of 19 Wake County NCGA seats, both establishment parties have 2024 candidates in only 11! Statewide, in 2024 there are 35 NCGA districts where either the Ds or Rs are not fielding a candidate. So in over 20% of our state, not only are voters denied the opportunity to cast a meaningful vote, but they don’t even get to experience a discussion of the issues, with only one establishment party candidate running.

Real, practical, effective solutions for electoral reform

  • As has been done in Arizona, California, Colorado, and Michigan, empower an independent non-partisan commission to perform redistrictingAmend our election law to allow independents to serve on the Boards of Elections and run for partisan office without having to file petitions.
  • Enjoin the commission to avoid splitting municipalities and counties wherever feasible—which is the way it’s supposed to be done according to the North Carolina state constitution—and prohibit them from considering party registration data. Some one-sided “safe” district will still occur “naturally”—for example where there are heavy concentrations of Democrats in Charlotte and Raleigh—but overall there will be many more competitive districts once political gerrymandering is outlawed and political districts respect county and municipal borders.